Business Personal Property and Theft Coverage under HO Policy

We provide coverage to our insured under a homeowner's policy. Coverage is written under AAIS Form 3 Ed 2.0. Our insured is reporting a theft claim. The loss occurred away from the insured premises as insured's vehicle was broken into. Our insured is reporting a stenograph machine and other related equipment were stolen as the equipment was in the trunk of the vehicle.

The policy has a limitation of $250 for personal property used, in whole or in part for “business” purposes while away from the “insured premises”. Our insured admits the equipment was formerly used in her profession, as she was a court reporter by trade. However, she informs she has not worked as a court reporter in several months and now has a job as a bookkeeper with no intention of going back into court reporting. She states the equipment was in the trunk as that is where she put it several months ago after she took her last job and that seemed to be as good as place as any to store it.

Our question is: can property once considered business property at some point become non-business property? We have had similar claims in the past such as a retired mechanic having tools stolen which he claimed at the time of theft were only for personal use since insured was retired. However, the stenograph machine seems so obviously linked to business purposes, it would be hard to imagine it being used for any other purpose. Could not any insured claim they had just retired from a profession a few days before the loss if the insurance company tried to apply this limitation?

We thought about asking insured for current tax return to see if they claimed income from court reporting but, of course, 2007 return would not yet be filed. Also, would it make a difference if insured claimed the cost of equipment as an expense or depreciated the equipment on previous tax returns?

Missouri Subscriber

You have an interesting situation. I've discovered that stenographers do buy their own equipment and it can run from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. The insured could have held onto the equipment for sentimental purposes, or maybe to sell in the future on eBay. If a dance teacher has a drawer full of leotards and slippers, but is no longer teaching dance, the leotards are no longer business property. She doesn't have to get rid of them to prove she's become a nurse and won't go back to teaching; she may have saved the items for sentimental value, wear the leotards for gardening or just be a packrat.

 

Couch on Insurance 148:13 states: “A business property exclusion, however, does not apply to property merely because it once held that status, and the property will be covered if, at the time of the loss, it was no longer being used in a business.” Your concern that what's to prevent someone from stating they retired two days before the loss is valid. Her former employer should certainly be able to verify dates of employment and so could her new employer. Unfortunately, there's no way to guarantee that someone won't at some time in the future go back to a former profession; some things you have to take on faith as people can't accurately predict their future.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis