Additional Insureds as Claimants

Q

When we insure clubs for liability, we always add the Additional Insured—Club Members endorsement (CG 20 02 11 85) to the commercial general liability coverage form (CGL) to give all members liability protection while they are performing activities on behalf of the club. One underwriter states that when we do this, club members who are injured through the negligence of the club would not be able to recover damages under the club's CGL coverage form, since they are insureds under the policy. We do not believe this was the intent of the endorsement and believe that a member would be able to collect from the club's CGL form if he or she were injured while performing an activity on behalf of the club.

If the club is covered for its liability to an insured club member, would the same reasoning apply to an injured member of a church insured under a CGL form with the Additional Insured—Church Members, Officers and Volunteer Workers endorsement (CG 20 22 10 01)?

Also, does either endorsement affect coverage under the medical payments section of the CGL form?

Pennsylvania Subscriber

A

You are correct. The separation of insureds clause (also known as the severability of interest clause or the cross liability clause) in the conditions section of the commercial general liability coverage form makes it possible for one insured to be covered when sued by another insured. In part the clause says, “Except with respect to the Limits of Insurance…this insurance applies…b. Separately to each insured against whom claim is made or 'suit' is brought.” Thus, in spite of being an insured by virtue of the Additional Insured—Club Member Endorsement (CG 20 02 11 85), a member of a club who is injured as a result of the club's negligence could expect the club's CGL form to respond to a claim made against the club.

The same effect results from the attachment of the Additional Insured—Church Members, Officers and Volunteer Workers endorsement (CG 20 22) to a church's CGL form. The church is protected when sued by insured church members, officers and volunteer workers for injury resulting from the church's negligence.

The answer is different with respect to Coverage C, Medical Payments, of the CGL form. Unlike coverage A, Bodily Injury and Property Damage Liability, Coverage C excludes coverage for bodily injury to any insured. However, the additional insured endorsement for churches (CG 20 22) countermands this exclusion by limiting it to exclude coverage for bodily injury “to any insured, except church members or volunteer workers who are not paid a fee, salary or other compensation.” (Presumably church officers and trustees would be subject to the exclusion's exception as long as they received no compensation for their duties. Clergymen, who are otherwise covered by the endorsement, would not be excepted from the exclusion unless they received no compensation for their work.)

On the other hand, the additional insured endorsement for clubs (CG 20 02) contains no such exception to the medical payment's exclusion of bodily injury to insureds. However, it does restrict members' status as insureds to those occasions when they incur liability for the club's activities or their own activities performed on behalf of the club.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis