Vehicle as a Cause of Loss on HO-3
Q
Our HO-3 insured has a riding lawn mower. One day, while mowing his yard, which slopes, the mower got out of control, tipped over, and was damaged. We think this loss should be covered, but the insurer disagrees. What is your opinion?
Iowa Subscriber
A
We agree that the loss is covered. The peril causing the loss is “vehicles.” The mower was the source of its own loss. Although many persons think that the “vehicles” peril refers only to damage caused to other property, as when, say, a vehicle runs over a bicycle, there is no restrictive, limiting, or otherwise defining language following the peril of “vehicles.”
If the coverage were to be restricted, “vehicles” would be followed by something on the order of “However, we do not cover damage to the vehicle itself,” as does the peril of “falling objects.” But since the peril stands as one word, the insured is entitled to a broad reading of the peril.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]