Pool Cover and Replacement Cost for a Homeowner

Q

We write a standard HO-3 on a client with a swimming pool. His policy also includes replacement cost coverage for personal property. Recently the pool and the pool cover suffered damage in a windstorm. We understand that the pool is not subject to replacement cost adjustment, because it is a “structure that is not a building.” However, we believe that the pool cover should be covered for replacement cost under the terms of the personal property replacement cost endorsement.

The adjuster maintains that the pool cover is part of the pool and, therefore, not eligible for replacement cost coverage. We disagree and would like your opinion.

North Dakota Subscriber

A

There are two ways to look at the pool cover. One is as personal property, and the other is as outdoor equipment. In either case, by purchasing the HO 04 90 10 00 the insured got replacement cost coverage on both personal property and outdoor equipment. Granted, the swimming pool itself is not subject to replacement cost in case of a loss, because it is a structure that is not a building. However, the pool cover is not a structure. It can be picked up and moved. Since it qualifies as personal property or as outdoor equipment, the loss should be paid on a replacement cost basis.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis