Loss of Use as Property Damage

Q

We insure an electrical company that was hired to do work in a vacant apartment of a large apartment building. The insured's employee used a master key to enter the apartment and left the key in the door while he worked inside. Someone took the key, necessitating that locks on all the apartments in the building be changed. Our insured was charged for the replacement of all the locks.

The insurer has denied the claim, stating that it does not meet the policy's definition of property damage.

Ohio Subscriber

A

The claim should be properly paid under paragraph b. of the definition of property damage, “loss of use of tangible property that is not physically injured.” The locks are tangible property and the theft of the master key rendered them useless for their intended purpose. The inability of the undamaged locks to provide security because of the loss of the master key is a perfect example of a loss of use claim covered under property damage liability insurance.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis