Q
Our client's computer was vandalized by installation of the Michelangelo virus that destroyed all his data on the hard drive. We submitted a claim to the company writing the data processing policy. They turned it down based on the wording that erasure of electronic recordings is excluded.
We contend that the cause of loss was not “erasure of electronic recordings.” Rather, it was vandalism.
North Carolina Subscriber
A
When the Michelangelo virus attacked your insured's computer, the result was erasure of the data. This manuscripted policy says that it does not pay for “loss, damage, or expense” that is caused in any way by “erasure of electronic recordings.” What causes the erasure is immaterial. Both the erasure and any additional expense arising out of it are not covered.
If we call the installation of the virus “vandalism” (a peril that is not excluded), that still doesn't matter. The loss (economic loss) was caused by the “erasure of electronic recordings” and is not covered.
The insurer has eliminated any exposure to payment for “erasure” by the insertion of this “concurrent causation” language.
This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers
Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.
- Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
- Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
- Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
- Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
- Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis
Already have an account? Sign In Now
For enterprise-wide or corporate access, please contact our Sales Department at 1-800-543-0874 or email [email protected]