Certificates of Insurance and
Conflicting Policy Language

Q

We have a question about certificates of insurance. Our insured was named as an additional insured on another party's CGL form, but only received a copy of a certificate of insurance. That certificate stated that our insured was an additional insured “subject to the terms and conditions of the CGL form” that was issued to the other party.

A loss occurred in which several people were injured and our insured was named in the lawsuit. The other party's CGL insurer has denied coverage because of an exclusion on the form, and our insured wants to know if the certificate of insurance means anything. He never read the other party's CGL form but he thought the certificate of insurance gave him the necessary protection.

What can our insured do?

Maryland Subscriber

A

If the CGL form excludes the occurrence that caused the bodily injury, the certificate of insurance will not change that fact. The bottom line is that in most instances the language of an insurance coverage form takes precedence over language on a certificate of insurance, especially if there is conflict between the two items. Certificates of insurance mainly just provide information on the type and limits of insurance that are provided by the insurance policies indicated. For more information on certificates of insurance, see Certificates of Insurance.

There are court cases that you may want to review to help your insured understand that certificates of insurance should not be seen as insurance coverage policies. For example, in G.E. Tignall & Company, Inc. v. Reliance National Insurance Company, 102 F. Supp. 2d 300 (D. Md. 2000), the district court said that “ordinarily, the presentation of a certificate of insurance alone does not create coverage or legal duties; it is not a contract of insurance, but merely evidence that a contract has been issued.” As another example, in First Financial Insurance Company v. Jetco Contracting Corporation, 2000 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10229 (S.D. N.Y. 2000), the court said the following: “as a general rule, where the certificate of insurance states expressly that it is subject to the terms and conditions of the policy, the language of the policy controls and the insurer may not be responsible for covering the third party;” and, “it is settled that a certificate of insurance is merely evidence of a contract for insurance.”

As these cases point out, in general policy language prevails over certificate of insurance language. This is the general rule, because if the certificate does not refer to the insurance policy, the certificate language governs the extent and terms of the coverage. A U.S. Circuit Court pointed this out in T.H.E. Insurance Company v. City of Alton, 227 F.3d 802 (7th Cir. 2000). So, you may want to read your insured's copy of the certificate to see the exact wording on the certificate.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis