Pins v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company, 2007 WL 414365 (C.A.8 (S.D.), 2007) involved an insured who engaged in a sexual affair with the wife of another man. The husband sued the insured in a South Dakota state court, asserting claims for alienation of affections, intentional infliction of emotional distress, and negligent infliction of emotional distress. The insured tendered the lawsuit to the insurer, asserting that the insurer must defend and indemnify the insured under his Personal Liability Umbrella Policy in effect at the time in question.

 The insurer declined to defend, concluding that the policy did not cover the husband's claims. The insured filed suit against the insurer seeking declaratory relief, alleging breach of its contractual duty to defend and bad faith.

The district court granted partial summary judgment in favor of the insured, concluding that the insurer had a duty to defend against the spouse's alienation of affections claim because it was possible, indeed likely, that the insured did not intend to break up the husband's marriage by having sexual relations with the wife.

This premium content is locked for FC&S Coverage Interpretation Subscribers

Enjoy unlimited access to the trusted solution for successful interpretation and analyses of complex insurance policies.

  • Quality content from industry experts with over 60 years insurance experience, combined
  • Customizable alerts of changes in relevant policies and trends
  • Search and navigate Q&As to find answers to your specific questions
  • Filter by article, discussion, analysis and more to find the exact information you’re looking for
  • Continually updated to bring you the latest reports, trending topics, and coverage analysis